BadCongress.com - Keeping an eye...on our elected officials!
FreedomToFascism.com - Save America One Patriot At A Time
 
  Home | Blogs | Find Your Senator | US Congress | US Senate | US House of Representatives | The Constitution | The Declaration of Independence | Movie & Video Clips | Site Map | Contact
 

Economists Oppose More Stimulus? by Paul Krugman

May 17, 2009 - By New York Times Writer Paul Krugman


That’s the headline of this WSJ article. And it’s true that most of the economic forecasters they surveyed don’t want more stimulus. But the question is why.

And here’s the thing: it’s NOT because they think a solid recovery is on the way. On the contrary, their outlook is quite bleak: on average, the surveyed economists expect unemployment to rise to 10 percent, still be 10 percent in June 2010, and fall only to 9.5 percent by the end of 2010. And a fair number of the forecasters — including Jan Hatzius of Goldman, whose analysis I follow closely, and has been spot on so far — think that unemployment will actually rise through 2010.

So they’re not saying that everything’s OK, no stimulus needed. They’re saying that they don’t like stimulus. And why should you be surprised? These are business economists; they’re generally conservative.

Aside from the value judgments, one thing I find really puzzling in this set of forecasts is the view on inflation. Remember, here’s what has been happening to wages in the face of high unemployment:

Now, if you think that unemployment is going to be at or above current levels for the next 18 months, wouldn’t you think there would be a significant risk of deflation? In fact, however, the average forecast is for an inflation rate of 1.7 percent next year. What’s the logic?

Bottom line: when I look at those unemployment projections, they look very bleak, and suggest that we’re in serious danger of falling into deflation. That is, to me they make the case FOR another stimulus.

Read more of Paul Krugman's Articles

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. BadConcress.com has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is BadCongress.com endorsed or sponsored by the originator.