By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer
August 27, 2007
WASHINGTON - GOP Sen. John Warner, who wants U.S. troops to
start coming home from Iraq by Christmas, said Sunday he may
support Democratic legislation ordering withdrawals if President
Bush refuses to set a return timetable soon.
"I'm going to have to evaluate it," Warner said. "I
don't say that as a threat, but I say that is an option we
all have to consider."
Warner, a former Navy Secretary and one-time chairman of the
Senate Armed Services Committee, is seen as someone who could
influence the debate among senators who have grown increasingly
uneasy about the unpopular war.
Warner's suggestion last week about bringing back some troops
put him at odds with Bush, who has insisted that conditions
on the ground should dictate any such decisions. Warner long
has opposed legislation pushing for timetables.
The Virginia Republican said Sunday it would be best for the
president, not Congress, to make a decision on withdrawals
and that overriding a presidential veto would be difficult.
But Warner made clear his view that people are losing patience
with the administration's strategy in Iraq, a significant change
is needed in September and troop withdrawals were the best
way to accomplish that.
"That's precisely what I said to the president. I said,
'Here is an option. You can initiate a first withdrawal. You
pick the number, Mr. President. And it would send a signal
to the Iraqi government that matches your words,'" Warner
said. "His words being, `We're not going to be there forever.'"
"The president has got to put teeth in these comments
that we're not there forever," he added.
The political wrangling comes as the White House and Congress
are headed toward a showdown on the Iraq war. In mid-September,
Gen. David Petraeus, the top military commander in Iraq, and
U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker plan to give their assessment
of Bush's decision this year to send 30,000 additional troops
to Iraq.
"We've got to show our resolve in the face of the Iraqi
government inaction," Warner said. "I'm looking for
in that message of the 15th what the president's going to do
to get this (Iraqi) government jump-started to deliver on its
commitment to our troops, 'You fight and die, get the security,
I will deliver Iraq as a reconciled unity government.'"
Over the weekend, beleaguered Iraq prime minister Nouri al-Maliki
lashed out at U.S. critics who have called for his ouster and
pushed for withdrawals. Al-Maliki cited in particular Democratic
senators Hillary Clinton and Carl Levin, who the prime minister
said "consider Iraq as if it were one of their villages."
Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said he was troubled with the slow
pace of al-Maliki's government in fostering political reconciliation
but cautioned that U.S. efforts to push too hard could backfire.
"Senator Warner is a great patriot and a student of history,
and he's clearly sending a signal to the Iraqis that our patience
is not unlimited, and that's correct," said Cornyn, a
fellow member of Senate Armed Services Committee. "But
I don't think it's in our best interest to put so much pressure
on the new Iraqi government that it absolutely collapses."
"We don't want to allow that to happen, because it would
make us less safe here at home," he said.
But former Democratic Sen. John Edwards, a 2008 presidential
candidate, said he believed even stronger pressure was needed
to reduce bloodshed and force political compromise in Iraq,
regardless of what top military advisers say in their progress
report next month.
Every defense funding bill Congress sends to Bush should set
a timetable for Iraq, and Democrats should be willing to filibuster
if necessary to force action, he said.
"Although they haven't done squat yet, I would give (al-Maliki)
and the Sunnis at least a few months to reach a compromise.
But they've got to know there's a deadline," Edwards said
while campaigning in New Hampshire.
Warner appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press," and Cornyn
spoke on ABC's "This Week."
___
Associated Press writer Holly Ramer in Manchester, N.H., contributed
to this report.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. BadConcress.com has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is BadCongress.com
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
|
