David Ray Griffin, The Canadian
January 23, 2008
With regard to the morning of 9/11, everyone agrees that at
some time after 9:03 (when the South Tower of the World Trade
Center was struck) and before 10:00, Vice President Dick Cheney
went down to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC),
sometimes simply called the “bunker,” under the
east wing of the White House. Everyone also agrees that, once
there, Cheney was in charge---that he was either making decisions
or relaying decisions from President Bush. But there is enormous
disagreement as to exactly when Cheney entered the PEOC.
According to The 9/11 Commission Report, Cheney arrived “shortly
before 10:00, perhaps at 9:58” (The 9/11 Commission Report
[henceforth 9/11CR], 40). This official time, however, contradicts
almost all previous reports, some of which had him there before
9:20. This difference is important because, if the 9/11 Commission’s
time is correct, Cheney was not in charge in the PEOC when
the Pentagon was struck, or for most of the period during which
United Flight 93 was approaching Washington. But if the reports
that have him there by 9:20 are correct, he was in charge in
the PEOC all that time.
Mineta’s Report of Cheney’s Early Arrival
Norman
Mineta’s
Report of Cheney’s
Early Arrival
|
|
|
The most well-known statement contradicting the 9/11 Commission
was made by Secretary of Transportation
Norman Mineta during his public testimony to the 9/11
Commission on May 23,
2003. Saying that he “arrived at the PEOC at about 9:20 AM,” Mineta
reported that he then overheard part of an ongoing conversation,
which had obviously begun before he arrived, between a young
man and Vice President Cheney. This conversation was about
a plane coming toward Washington and ended with Cheney confirming
that “the orders still stand.” When Commissioner
Timothy Roemer later asked Mineta how long after his arrival
he overheard this conversation about whether the orders still
stood, Mineta replied: “Probably about five or six
minutes.” This would mean, Roemer pointed out, “about
9:25 or 9:26.”
This is a remarkable contradiction. Given the fact that Cheney,
according to Mineta, had been engaged in an ongoing exchange,
he must have been in the PEOC for several minutes before Mineta’s
9:20 arrival. If Cheney had been there since 9:15, there would
be a 43-minute contradiction between Mineta’s testimony
and The 9/11 Commission Report. Why would such an enormous
contradiction exist?
One possible explanation would be that Mineta was wrong. His
story, however, is in line with that of many other witnesses.
Other Reports Supporting Cheney’s Early Arrival
Richard Clarke reported that he, Cheney, and Condoleezza Rice
had a brief meeting shortly after 9:03, following which the
Secret Service wanted Cheney and Rice to go down to the PEOC.
Rice, however, first went with Clarke to the White House’s
Video Teleconferencing Center, where Clarke was to set up a
video conference, which began at about 9:10. After spending
a few minutes there, Rice said, according to Clarke: “You’re
going to need some decisions quickly. I’m going to the
PEOC to be with the Vice President. Tell us what you need.” At
about 9:15, Norman Mineta arrived and Clarke “suggested
he join the Vice President” (Against All Enemies, 2-5).
Clarke thereby implied that Cheney was in the PEOC several
minutes prior to 9:15.
In an ABC News program on the first anniversary of 9/11, Cheney’s
White House photographer David Bohrer reported that, shortly
after 9:00, some Secret Service agents came into Cheney’s
office and said, “Sir, you have to come with us.” During
this same program, Rice said: “As I was trying to find
all of the principals, the Secret Service came in and said, ‘You
have to leave now for the bunker. The Vice President's already
there. There may be a plane headed for the White House.’” ABC’s
Charles Gibson then said: “In the bunker, the Vice President
is joined by Rice and Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta” (“9/11:
Interviews by Peter Jennings,” ABC News, September 11,
2002).
The 9/11 Commission’s Late-Arrival Claim
The 9/11 Commission agreed that the Vice President was hustled
down to the PEOC after word was received that a plane was headed
towards the White House. It claimed, however, that this word
was not received until 9:33. But even then, according to the
Commission, the Secret Service agents immediately received
another message, telling them that the aircraft had turned
away, so “[n]o move was made to evacuate the Vice President
at this time.” It was not until “just before 9:36” that
the Secret Service ordered Cheney to go below (9/11CR 39).
But even after he entered the underground corridor at 9:37,
Cheney did not immediately go to the PEOC. Rather:
Once inside, Vice President Cheney and the agents paused in
an area of the tunnel that had a secure phone, a bench, and
television. The Vice President asked to speak to the President,
but it took time for the call to be connected. He learned in
the tunnel that the Pentagon had been hit, and he saw television
coverage of the smoke coming from the building. (9/11CR 40)
Next, after Lynne Cheney “joined her husband in the
tunnel,” the Commission claimed, “Mrs. Cheney and
the Vice President moved from the tunnel to the shelter conference
room” after the call ended, which was not until after
9:55. As for Rice, the Commission added, she “entered
the conference room shortly after the Vice President” (9/11CR
40).
The contradiction could not be clearer. According to the Commission,
Cheney, far from entering the PEOC before 9:20, as Mineta and
others said, did not arrive there until about 9:58, 20 minutes
after the 9:38 strike on the Pentagon, about which he had learned
in the corridor.
Cheney’s Account on Meet the Press
The 9/11 Commission’s account even contradicted that
given by Cheney himself in a well-known interview. Speaking
to Tim Russert on NBC’s Meet the Press only five days
after 9/11, Cheney said: “[A]fter I talked to the president...
I went down into... the Presidential Emergency Operations Center...
[W]hen I arrived there within a short order, we had word the
Pentagon's been hit.” Cheney himself, therefore, indicated
that he had entered the PEOC prior to the (9:38) strike on
the Pentagon, not 20 minutes after it, as the Commission would
later claim.
Dealing with the Contradictions
How did the 9/11 Commission deal with the fact that its claim
about the time of Cheney’s arrival in the PEOC had been
contradicted by Bohrer, Clarke, Mineta, Rice, several news
reports, and even Cheney himself? It simply omitted any mention
of these contradictory reports.
Of these omissions, the most important was the Commission’s
failure to mention Norman Mineta’s testimony, even though
it was given to the Commission in an open hearing---as can
be seen by reading the transcript of that session (May 23,
2003). This portion of Mineta’s testimony was also deleted
from the official version of the video record of the 9/11 Commission
hearings in the 9/11 Commission archives. (It can, however,
be viewed on the Internet.)
During an interview for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
in 2006, Hamilton was asked what “Mineta told the Commission
about where Dick Cheney was prior to 10 AM.” Hamilton
replied: “I do not recall” (“9/11: Truth,
Lies and Conspiracy: Interview: Lee Hamilton,” CBC News,
21 August 2006). It was surprising that Hamilton could not
recall, because he had been the one doing the questioning when
Mineta told the story of the young man’s conversation
with Cheney. Hamilton, moreover, had begun his questioning
by saying to Mineta: “You were there [in the PEOC] for
a good part of the day. I think you were there with the Vice
President.” And Mineta’s exchange with Timothy
Roemer, during which it was established that Mineta had arrived
at about 9:20, came immediately after Hamilton’s interrogation.
And yet Hamilton, not being able to recall any of this, simply
said, “we think that Vice President Cheney entered the
bunker shortly before 10 o’clock.”
Obliterating Mineta’s Problematic Testimony
To see possible motives for the 9/11 Commission’s efforts
to obliterate Mineta’s story from the public record,
we need to look at the conversation he reported to the Commission.
He said:
During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon,
there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice
President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The
plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the
plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the
Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And
the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of
course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the
contrary?”
Mineta’s story had dangerous implications with regard
to the strike on the Pentagon, which occurred at 9:38. According
to the 9/11 Commission, the military did not know that an aircraft
was approaching the Pentagon until 9:36, so that it “had
at most one or two minutes to react to the unidentified plane
approaching Washington” (9/11CR 34). That claim was essential
for explaining, among other things, why the Pentagon had not
been evacuated before it was struck -- a fact that resulted
in 125 deaths. A spokesperson for Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld,
when asked why this evacuation had not occurred, said: “The
Pentagon was simply not aware that this aircraft was coming
our way” (Newsday, Sept. 23, 2001). Mineta’s testimony
implied, by contrast, that Cheney and others knew that an aircraft
was approaching Washington about 12 minutes before that strike.
Even more problematic was the question of the nature of “the
orders.” Mineta assumed, he said, that they were orders
to have the plane shot down. But the aircraft was not shot
down. Also, the expected orders, especially on a day when two
hijacked airliners had already crashed into buildings in New
York, would have been to shoot down any nonmilitary aircraft
entering the “prohibited” airspace over Washington,
in which “civilian flying is prohibited at all times” (“Pilots
Notified of Restricted Airspace; Violators Face Military Action,” FAA
Press Release, September 28, 2001). If those orders had been
given, there would have been no reason to ask if they still
stood. The question made sense only if the orders were to do
something unusual -- not to shoot the aircraft down. It appeared,
accordingly, that Mineta had inadvertently reported Cheney’s
confirmation of stand-down orders.
That Mineta’s report was regarded as dangerous is suggested
by the fact that the 9/11 Commission, besides deleting Mineta’s
testimony and delaying Cheney’s entrance to the bunker
by approximately 45 minutes, also replaced Mineta’s story
with a new story about an incoming aircraft. According to The
9/11 Commission Report, here is what really happened:
At 10:02, the communicators in the shelter began receiving
reports from the Secret Service of an inbound aircraft... At
some time between 10:10 and 10:15, a military aide told the
Vice President and others that the aircraft was 80 miles out.
Vice President Cheney was asked for authority to engage the
aircraft... The Vice President authorized fighter aircraft
to engage the inbound plane... The military aide returned a
few minutes later, probably between 10:12 and 10:18, and said
the aircraft was 60 miles out. He again asked for authorization
to engage. The Vice President again said yes. (9/11CR 41)
The 9/11 Commission thereby presented the incoming aircraft
story as one that ended with an order for a shoot down, not
a stand down. And by having it occur after 10:10, the Commission
not only disassociated it from the Pentagon strike but also
ruled out the possibility that Cheney’s shootdown authorization
might have led to the downing of United Flight 93 (which crashed,
according to the Commission, at 10:03).
Given the fact that the 9/11 Commission’s account of
Cheney’s descent to the bunker contradicted the testimony
of not only Norman Mineta but also many other witnesses, including
Cheney himself, Congress and the press need to launch investigations
to determine what really happened.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes. BadConcress.com has no affiliation
whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is BadCongress.com
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
|
